There are, of course, exceptions to this rule, especially when the injury involves a loss of a part of the body. Expert testimony would not be needed to say that a hand cut off at the wrist or a missing eye is a permanent injury.
One court decision that discusses whether or not expert testimony is needed to establish an injury’s permanence is Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. Griggs, which says in part, “If the injury is objective, and it is plainly apparent from the very nature of the injury that the injured person must of necessity undergo pain and suffering in the future, then most certainly the plaintiff would not be required to prove a fact so plainly evident… Where the injury is subjective, and of such a nature that laymen cannot, with reasonable certainty, know whether or not there will be future pain and suffering, there must be offered ecidency by expert witnesses, learned in human anatomy.”
Though most courts agree with this general principle, there is some difference between courts in terms of what injuries they consider to be permanent using the “plainly apparent” standard. Among the injuries they have disagreed over are a sprained ankle, a weak arm, nervousness, and pain from a fractured shoulder.
The best way to find out if expert testimony will be needed in your case is to consult with an experienced Orange County catastrophic injury attorney who will be up-to-date on the latest case law. To schedule a free consultation with Samer Habbas, please call (888) 848-5084.
If you were hit by a car in Riverside, you need to act quickly to…
Legal Options and Wrongful Death Claims | Samer Habbas & Associates, PC On Friday morning,…
If you were injured in a truck accident in San Diego, you may be able…
Tour Bus Loaded With Passengers Involved in Major Collision With Commercial Truck Near The San Elijo…
If you were injured in a Los Angeles car accident, you may be wondering how…
Samer Habbas & Associates, PC Analyzes Legal Rights and Personal Injury Claims after Major Freeway…