Best Law Firms Ranked By Best Lawyers USA 2025 - Best Rated Personal Injury Lawyers
High Stakes Litigators America's Top 100 Best Litigators Badge - Top Rated Injury Attorneys
Avvo 10.0 Superb rating badge- Top Rated Personal Injury Attorneys
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Badge- Justice for People
Better Business Bureau accredited business, Seal A+ Rating
Super Lawyers Badge - Selected as a Rising Star in Personal Injury Cases
Preferred Attorneys Brain Injury Association of America - legal expertise for brain injury cases
Firm badge Top 100 personal injury settlements in California in 2023 - Top-Rated Injury Attorneys
Top 50 Personal Injury Settlements California 2023 Firm badge - Top-Rated Personal Injury Attorneys

Samer Habbas closed on a $450,000 Third-Party Claim Settlement for an Auto Accident

hird-Party Claim Settlement for an Auto Accident

Cypress, Calif. — Senior Partner, Samer Habbas, of the Law Offices of Samer Habbas & Associates was able to land a $450,000 settlement for an auto accident. The plaintiff was driving on the job when they were suddenly rear-ended. The driver sustained a cervical disc herniation from the impact of the accident. 

Habbas filed suit against both the driver and the plaintiff’s employer. The vast majority of the client’s medical bills were paid for worker’s compensation coverage. As a result of an aggressive representation, we were able to resolve this matter for $450,000. The amount of the settlement was for pain and suffering only, as the worker’s compensation carrier settled its reimbursement of medical expenses paid out separately. 

It is important to understand the interaction of the worker’s compensation and third party personal injury matters. Many people fail to file a third party case against the negligent party when they are injured while on the job. This may cost a person a significant amount of recovery. For example, if a person is operating his/her vehicle while doing something for their employer and gets rear ended, that person is entitled to two actions. The first one would be a worker’s compensation matter through the employer. The second one would be to hold the person that drove carelessly responsible for any unpaid medical bills, future medical expenses, and past, present and future pain and suffering.

This case was challenging in the sense that neither vehicle involved had significant visible damage. The insurance company initially did not want to settle due to the nature of damages to each vehicle. Habbas remained aggressive and adamant that a just settlement is made with the client or we will go to trial. Eventually, defense agreed to settle. 

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Free Case
    Evaluation

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalized advertising. You can Learn More About Us how we use cookies and how you can opt-out. We do not sell your information.

Accept Decline