Best Law Firms Ranked By Best Lawyers USA 2025 - Best Rated Personal Injury Lawyers
High Stakes Litigators America's Top 100 Best Litigators Badge - Top Rated Injury Attorneys
Avvo 10.0 Superb rating badge- Top Rated Personal Injury Attorneys
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Badge- Justice for People
Better Business Bureau accredited business, Seal A+ Rating
Super Lawyers Badge - Selected as a Rising Star in Personal Injury Cases
Preferred Attorneys Brain Injury Association of America - legal expertise for brain injury cases
Firm badge Top 100 personal injury settlements in California in 2023 - Top-Rated Injury Attorneys
Top 50 Personal Injury Settlements California 2023 Firm badge - Top-Rated Personal Injury Attorneys

Conor Stanton settled a funeral home negligence case for $120,000

stantonLos Angeles, Calif. — Associate Attorney, Conor Stanton of the Law Offices of Samer Habbas & Associates recovered a $120,000 settlement on a funeral home negligence claim. Prior to the decedent’s death, her final wish was to have a graveside funeral service. Following her demise, the decedent’s family (plaintiffs) contracted with the funeral home (defendants) to make the service and burial arrangements. However, upon early arrival before the scheduled time of the funeral service, the family discovered that the defendants had already entombed and sealed the decedent inside the crypt. The plaintiffs were unable to properly perform the graveside service, thus failing to grant the dying wish of their loved one. They were robbed of their right to properly say goodbye to their deceased beloved before they laid her to rest.

Associate Attorney, Conor Stanton presented six causes of action against the funeral home: breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and fraud.

The defendants entered into a written agreement with the plaintiffs. That contract was breached when the defendants entombed the decedent before the agreed-upon time. The plaintiffs were in full compliance with their end of the contract, having paid in advance for the requested services. 

The funeral home clearly acted negligently. The plaintiffs entered into a contracted agreement with the defendants with justifiable reliance that was induced by the representations the defendants made. By carelessly mishandling the decedent’s remains, the defendants not only violated the fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiffs but also failed to uphold the proper standards of professional morticians they claimed to be. 

The incident caused severe emotional distress to the plaintiffs. The family entrusted the funeral home to respectfully take care of their loved one’s body. The defendants’ negligence left the plaintiffs traumatized and disrupted their grieving process. 

Most funeral homes include an arbitration clause within their contracts, as was written in the signed agreement between the defendants and plaintiffs. Stanton fought every motion to compel arbitration and filed suit against the defendants. Continuing to push for arbitration, the defendants presented a lowball offer of $10,500. The extent of damage the funeral home and mortuary caused the family of the decedent far exceeds the degrading offer. With a relentless approach, Stanton settled the matter in litigation for $120,000.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Free Case
    Evaluation

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalized advertising. You can Learn More About Us how we use cookies and how you can opt-out. We do not sell your information.

Accept Decline