Best Law Firms Ranked By Best Lawyers USA 2025 - Best Rated Personal Injury Lawyers
High Stakes Litigators America's Top 100 Best Litigators Badge - Top Rated Injury Attorneys
Avvo 10.0 Superb rating badge- Top Rated Personal Injury Attorneys
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Badge- Justice for People
Better Business Bureau accredited business, Seal A+ Rating
Super Lawyers Badge - Selected as a Rising Star in Personal Injury Cases
Preferred Attorneys Brain Injury Association of America - legal expertise for brain injury cases
Firm badge Top 100 personal injury settlements in California in 2023 - Top-Rated Injury Attorneys
Top 50 Personal Injury Settlements California 2023 Firm badge - Top-Rated Personal Injury Attorneys

Adam Kocaj obtains a $250,000 settlement for a Rear-End Accident with an Underinsured Motorist

adam-kocajNorco, Calif. — Associate Attorney, Adam Kocaj of the Law Offices of Samer Habbas & Associates secures a combined settlement of $250,000 for an Eggshell Plaintiff who was in a rear-end accident with an Underinsured Motorist.

The claimant was driving himself and five other passengers when their vehicle was struck from behind by a full-size SUV. Despite being restrained, the impact of the rear-end collision caused severe hyperextension to the claimant’s head, neck, upper torso, and back.

The claimant had a history of injuries to his knee and lower back from prior incidences. Therefore, the claimant was classified as an “Eggshell Plaintiff” at the time of the accident, susceptible to further aggravation of prior injuries. After a thorough medical examination, he was diagnosed with cervical hypolordosis (flattening of a curve in the spine) and right lumbar radiculopathy (spinal nerve root compression).

With no change in his lower back pain after chiropractic treatment and physical therapy, the claimant presented to a pain management doctor to receive an L5-S1 epidural injection. During his post-epidural examination, the claimant was recommended a second and final epidural injection. The pain management doctor informed the claimant that he also may need a right L5-S1 microdiscectomy (microdecompression surgery). 

By failing to observe traffic directly in front and driving at a speed unsafe for road conditions, the defendant is liable for all damages caused by this accident. All drivers have a general duty to exercise basic road safety practices, this includes being attentive to all other surrounding vehicles occupying the roadway. The defendant’s negligence violated several statutes controlling the safe operation of a motor vehicle. When such violations harm another, they are protected by the enactment of the statutes. Our client was harmed, as such, the defendant is held legally responsible for their actions under a theory of negligence.

Associate Attorney, Adam Kocaj filed a claim against the defendant’s insurance demanding full policy limits. The defense attempted to argue the extent of the injuries sustained based on the prior injuries our client suffered before the accident. However, the “eggshell plaintiff” rule (CACI No. 3927), recognized in the state of California, protects the rights of plaintiffs with pre-existing conditions that make them more susceptible to injuries. Kocaj used this doctrine to support that our client’s prior injuries worsened due to the accident the defendant had caused, making the defendant responsible for the further aggravation of our client’s prior injuries. With no room to argue against damages and liability, defense tendered their policy limits of $50,000.

Being that our client’s recovery process will long surpass the length of this claim, the emotional, physical, and financial damages well exceed the third-party’s policy limits of $50,000. Fortunately, our client had Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage within their own auto insurance policy. Kocaj opened a UIM claim and submitted a demand to recover the remaining limit coverages. Soon after, the insurance company accepted Kocaj’s offer to release the remaining policy limits of $200,000—for a combined global settlement of $250,000.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Free Case
    Evaluation

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalized advertising. You can Learn More About Us how we use cookies and how you can opt-out. We do not sell your information.

Accept Decline